3-rx.comCustomer Support
3-rx.com
   
HomeAbout UsFAQContactHelp
News Center
Health Centers
Medical Encyclopedia
Drugs & Medications
Diseases & Conditions
Medical Symptoms
Med. Tests & Exams
Surgery & Procedures
Injuries & Wounds
Diet & Nutrition
Special Topics



\"$alt_text\"');"); } else { echo"\"$alt_text\""; } ?>


Join our Mailing List





Syndicate

You are here : 3-RX.com > Home > AIDS/HIV -

Delay in AIDS drug use in South Africa costly

AIDS/HIVNov 28, 08

Researchers from Harvard School of Public Health in Boston estimate that between 2000 and 2005 more than 330,000 lives were lost because a “feasible and timely” AIDS drug treatment program was not implemented in South Africa.

By not implementing a mother-to-child transmission HIV prevention program during the same 5-year period, an estimated 35,000 infants were born with HIV.

Dr. Pride Chigwedere and colleagues describe their analyses that generated these estimates in a Perspectives article published online in the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes.

By way of background, at the peak of the South Africa AIDS epidemic, they explain, “the government, going against consensus scientific opinion, argued that HIV was not the cause of AIDS and that antiretroviral drugs were not useful for patients and declined to accept freely donated nevirapine (an AIDS drug) and grants from the Global Fund.”

To estimate lost benefits due to these decisions, the investigators compared the actual number of South Africans who received drugs for treatment of HIV infection or for prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission between 2000 and 2005 with what was reasonably feasible in the country during that period. They then multiplied the differences by the average “life-years” conferred by antiretroviral therapy for African patients with AIDS or the efficacy of antiretroviral treatment in preventing mother-to-child transmission.

For comparison, the researchers used data from Botswana and Namibia, neighboring countries facing a similar burden of HIV/AIDS and with similar resources per capita. In contrast to South Africa, Botswana and Namibia began a program for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission in 1999 and a national AIDS treatment program in 2001.

The investigators estimate that the total lost benefits of not using antiretroviral drugs between 2000 and 2005 amount to at least 3.8 million “person-years.”

“Access to appropriate public health practice is often determined by a small number of political leaders,” they note in their report.

“In the case of South Africa, many lives were lost because of a failure to accept the use of available antiretrovirals to prevent and treat HIV/AIDS in a timely manner,” they conclude.

SOURCE: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2008.



Print Version
Tell-a-Friend
comments powered by Disqus

RELATED ARTICLES:
  Hepatitis C more prevalent than HIV/AIDS or Ebola yet lacks equal attention
  Cell-associated HIV mucosal transmission: The neglected pathway
  Offering option of initial HIV care at home increases use of ART
  HIV-1 movement across genital tract cells surprisingly enhanced by usurping antibody response
  Indonesia probes Bali tattoo HIV infection report
  Obama raises U.S. goal on fighting AIDS
  New device to test blood can spot cancer cells, HIV on the fly
  Rare HIV-positive individuals shed light on how body could effectively handle infection
  New research examines how HIV infections occur on the molecular level
  An answer to a longstanding question: How HIV infection kills T cells
  Researchers say uncover HIV, insulin resistance link
  Beatrice Hahn and George Shaw, Pioneers in HIV Research, to Join Penn Medicine

 












Home | About Us | FAQ | Contact | Advertising Policy | Privacy Policy | Bookmark Site