3-rx.comCustomer Support
3-rx.com
   
HomeAbout UsFAQContactHelp
News Center
Health Centers
Medical Encyclopedia
Drugs & Medications
Diseases & Conditions
Medical Symptoms
Med. Tests & Exams
Surgery & Procedures
Injuries & Wounds
Diet & Nutrition
Special Topics



\"$alt_text\"');"); } else { echo"\"$alt_text\""; } ?>


Join our Mailing List





Syndicate

You are here : 3-RX.com > Home > Urine Problems -

Delayed surgery for bladder cancer not harmful

Urine ProblemsNov 24, 05

Contrary to several recent reports, delaying bladder cancer surgery for several weeks after diagnosis does not worsen a person’s odds of surviving the disease, Swedish investigators report in The Journal of Urology. The author of a related editorial, however, contends that the sooner the surgery is performed, the better.

Recent research suggesting that delays between diagnosis and surgery in patients with bladder cancer adversely affects survival is “alarming” because it suggests that slow hospital routines influence patient prognosis, Dr. Fredrik Liedberg and colleagues from Lund University Hospital write.

They studied the issue of treatment delay and prognosis in all 141 patients who underwent bladder removal for advanced bladder cancer at their hospital during an 8-year period.

The time from cancer diagnosis to bladder removal was typically about 49 days, according to the team. However, a longer treatment delay - 63 days - was observed for the 71 patients who were initially seen at another hospital before being referred to the researchers’ center.

According to Liedberg and colleagues, “treatment delay did not influence (the risk) of death from bladder cancer. Considering all cases, there was no significant correlation between treatment delay and” progression of the cancer.

In an editorial comment, Dr. Michael Cookson of Vanderbilt University in Nashville notes that this study addresses “an important topic which has received increasing attention. Specifically, does delay in treatment compromise survival?”

While the current study suggests that the answer is no, the “preponderance of evidence” to date suggests that a delay of more than 90 days does have a significantly negative impact on outcomes including…survival, Cookson points out.

Moreover, in the current series, most patients were treated “relatively expeditiously”, so the “true impact of delay may not be detectable in this study,” he contends.

Cookson believes there is a “window of curability that can be exceeded. Therefore, once the decision has been made to perform (bladder removal), it should be performed in a timely fashion,” he concludes.

SOURCE: The Journal of Urology, November 2005.



Print Version
Tell-a-Friend
comments powered by Disqus

RELATED ARTICLES:
  The Not-so-Sweet Truth About Sugar- A Risk Choice?
  New tests and interventions may help prevent future health problems
  Anemia Tougher to Tackle in Black Children with Kidney Disease
  Drug mistakes common in US kidney dialysis patients
  Heart Test Found Safe for Pre-Transplant Kidney Patients
  Evidence-based guideline ‘Incontinent Urostomy’ published
  Protecting Kidney Function During Heart Failure
  Some older men may safely stop PSA testing
  China probes “mystery” kidney stones in children
  Gene Mutation Adds Risk in Child Kidney Transplants
  Protein predicts chronic kidney disease progression
  Dialysis Patients Residing at Higher Altitude Have Lower Rate of Death

 












Home | About Us | FAQ | Contact | Advertising Policy | Privacy Policy | Bookmark Site