3-rx.comCustomer Support
3-rx.com
   
HomeAbout UsFAQContactHelp
News Center
Health Centers
Medical Encyclopedia
Drugs & Medications
Diseases & Conditions
Medical Symptoms
Med. Tests & Exams
Surgery & Procedures
Injuries & Wounds
Diet & Nutrition
Special Topics



\"$alt_text\"');"); } else { echo"\"$alt_text\""; } ?>


Join our Mailing List





Syndicate

You are here : 3-RX.com > Home > Public Health -

Real Battle Over Mental Health Law About to Begin

Public HealthMar 31, 06

The UK government’s climb down on reform of mental health legislation is not a victory -  the real battle is about to begin, warns a senior doctor in this week’s BMJ.

The UK government’s announcement that it has abandoned its eight year attempt to achieve a new Mental Health Act for England and Wales is an apparent victory for patients, professionals, and liberal democracy, writes Professor Nigel Eastman of St George’s Hospital, London.

But faced with almost unanimous opposition from those with an interest in mental health care, the government has stated that it will instead introduce a shortened and streamlined bill amending the 1983 Mental Health Act.

This amending legislation will replace the Draft Mental Health Bill that had been described as a “Public Order Act” which would be “unethical, unworkable, and also ineffective,” even in enhancing public safety.

The bill’s most contentious proposals included widening the criteria for compulsory detention and treatment, and removing the “treatability test” for personality disorder (so that those with dangerous and severe personality disorder could be detained by doctors when not capable of being sentenced by criminal courts). It’s uncertain whether the legal amendments now being proposed will be any less controversial, says Eastman.

The government’s climb down on reform of mental health legislation is, almost certainly, merely a prelude to climbing up by another route, he warns.

Crucially, amendments should include introducing guiding principles into the act, including those of autonomy and reciprocal rights, in order to enhance consistent and ethical operation of the legislation. Unsurprisingly, this is resisted by the government.

He urges professionals working in mental health care, including general practitioners, to be vigilant in scrutinising the detail of the proposed amending legislation.

“There is a grave danger of being lulled into a false sense of security through having apparently won the seven year phoney war. The real parliamentary battle is about to begin,” he concludes.

http://press.psprings.co.uk/



Print Version
Tell-a-Friend
comments powered by Disqus

RELATED ARTICLES:
  Sex and violence may not really sell products
  GPs and the Fit for Work scheme
  Study shows global warming is unlikely to reduce winter deaths
  Academies make recommendations for improving public health
  As death rates drop, nonfatal diseases and injuries take a bigger toll on health globally
  Designing better medical implants
  Single low-magnitude electric pulse successfully fights inflammation
  Total annual hospital costs could be reduced by rapid candidemia identification
  UTMB develops new online tool for nurses
  Online health information - keep it simple!
  Your privacy online: Health information at serious risk of abuse
  Physician guidelines for Googling patients need revisions

 












Home | About Us | FAQ | Contact | Advertising Policy | Privacy Policy | Bookmark Site