New Model Helps Identify What Works in Mental Health Treatment

In a race to achieve accountability and credibility, the mental health profession has looked to develop evidence-based treatments (EBTs)—psychotherapeutic procedures that have been shown in empirical research to work for the majority of patients.

The problem with EBTs, however, is that researchers often have multiple ways to measure improvement; things like reductions in symptoms, more harmonious relationships, or improved grades. Invariably, different ways of gauging outcomes yield inconsistent conclusions and this makes for a murky picture as researchers attempt to deem treatments as evidence-based or not.

But Andres De Los Reyes of the Institute for Juvenile Research and Alan Kazdin of Yale University believe they have developed a way to make sense of this information. In the February issue of Current Directions in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, they detail what they have dubbed “The Range of Possible Changes Model.”

The model uses a classification system that effectively sorts pertinent information from multiple studies. By classifying the many forms of evidence—like whether the treatment is consistently supported and how treatment outcome was measured—researchers can examine whether two studies of the same treatment produce the same results.

The authors hope their model will help eliminate many of the inconsistencies that arise in EBT research, alleviating some of the criticism from EBT detractors. “The RPC Model takes into account inconsistencies and employing the framework will allow researchers to draw reliable and valid conclusions amidst them” write the authors.

Author Contact: Andres De Los Reyes .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

# # #

Current Directions in Psychological Science publishes concise reviews on the latest advances in theory and research spanning all of scientific psychology and its applications. For a copy of the article “When the Evidence Says. ‘Yes, No, and Maybe So’” and access to other Current Directions in Psychological Science research findings, please contact Catherine West at (202) 783-2077 or .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Contact: Catherine West
(202) 783-2077
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Print Version
Tell-a-Friend comments powered by Disqus

RELATED ARTICLES:

Anxiety increases the risk of gastrointestinal infection and long-term complications   How negative stereotyping affects older people   Siblings of children with autism can show signs at 18 months   Exploring the connection between empathy, neurohormones and aggression   Maternal mood disorder and newborn neurobehavior   Study pinpoints cell type and brain region affected by gene mutations in autism   New evidence on the biological basis of highly impulsive and aggressive behaviors   Child Abuse Ad Shows Hidden Message for Children   90 percent of pediatric specialists not following clinical guidelines when treating preschoolers with ADHD   The risk of autism is not increased by ‘too many vaccines too soon’   Opioid prescription is on the increase   Japan tsunami stress may have brought on seizures: study